One hundred thousand posts!!

274

Well, we're currently suffering an epidemic called server growth.

Better cultivate that, usually it wither to death in a few weeks.
Also, it's population dependant, so it literally has a self-feed-back.

273

RO is even playing game with us or is it skot? giving us fake cards



272

you should display the card drawing that will be even more hilarious


>99 217

yea. maybe later on

99 216

here it is:



99 215

214

Can I make a new card drawing, can I?

I wanna play picasso

[ seems like the server went through a lot of bug fixing while I was gone huh ]

[ 267 ]

I've had time, that's all. Today I am trying to change the base equations that determine speeds, so they do not get negatively affected by stats, but by base level instead.

212

265*
There was a typo in the 271 post

And thanks for the update, it sounds pretty good so far. I'd have liked it if stats got new maluses, it was to me what was the most interesting thing in speccing in Mou.

[ to say the truth, it probably would be just better to follow the typos ]

[ 264 ]

263
Honesty inherits the land
- A Finnish Proverb

Rogem wrote:263
Honesty inherits the land
- A Finnish Proverb

i honestly think that you are wasting your future by "studying" theology 

so do i now inherit this server when skot drops dead?

262
I doubt that he would leave it to you. And it's not "The honest inherit...", it's "Honesty inherits..."

[ Honesty may inherits the land, but whenever we finish this through honesty we'll be all dead ]
[ Also, are we going to start ignoring Vit's posts on the countdown? If we do so, we should recount all the posts excluding vitriol's ]

[ 259 ]

Well, with this post the topic has 974 posts... So, we're actually down to 99,026! Are you motivated now?

Rogem wrote:it's not "The honest inherit...", it's "Honesty inherits..."

sorry, i interpreted the proverb under the assumption that the finnish are not a bunch of retards. honesty cannot inherit anything because it is not a sentient being bound by mortal laws and customs.
my mistake...

Rogem wrote:I doubt that he would leave it to you.

what kind of wretched man would leave nothing to his significant other?

Vitriol wrote:

Rogem wrote:I doubt that he would leave it to you.

what kind of wretched man would leave nothing to his significant other?

[ I would leave nothing ]

[ also, this topic have 715 replies . . . which mean that at some point we skipped some posts anyway ]
[ Insert Lazy Countdown ]

717 down with this...

99,293. I wonder what hell was I looking at last night.

shota cock vore?

omg it's loki...put your cool face

292 99

[ You were looking at the post count of the entire section "The Rest", which does have 980~ posts ]

[ 290 ]

Vroom

99 289

meh

Hemp

99 287

It is in the sincere hope of getting Vitriol off our backs that this letter is offered to an intelligent and discriminating public. Read on, gentle reader, and hear what I have to say. I personally have a New Year's resolution for Vitriol: He should pick up a book before he jumps to the devious conclusion that all it takes to solve our social woes are shotgun marriages, heavy-handed divorce laws, and a return to some mythical 1950s Shangri-la.

I imagine that I am aware that many people may object to the severity of my language. But is there no cause for severity? Naturally, I suspect that there is because Vitriol says that he can scare us by using big words like "poluphloisboiotatotic". I've seen more plausible things scrawled on the bathroom walls in elementary schools. He approximates a poxy paper-pusher as far as practical action is concerned but differs in psychology, ideology and motivation. As long as I live, I will be shouting this truth from rooftops and doing everything I can to enable adversaries to meet each other and establish direct personal bonds that contradict the stereotypes they rely upon to power their froward programs of Gleichschaltung.

I was thinking about how Vitriol somehow forgot to tell his forces that it is no exaggeration to say that anyone who was sober for more than an hour or two during the last five years knows that the ability to artistically arrange words in an amusing manner does not qualify someone to be the leading social voice of a country. And then it hit me. Vitriol intends to create a new social class. Blockish flakes, stuck-up demagogues, and incoherent blackguards will be given aristocratic status. The rest of us will be forced into serving as their advocates. I hardly need to tell you that he has an ideological axe to grind. Of that I am certain because I correctly predicted that he would initiate a reign of out-of-touch terror. Alas, I didn't think he'd do that so effectively—or so soon.

Vitriol's retorts to criticism are so rehearsed that he may be almost unconscious of what he's saying, as one is when one utters the responses in church. Surprised? You shouldn't be, because there are those who are informed and educated about the evils of Oblomovism, and there are those who are not. Vitriol is one of the uninformed, naturally, and that's why it's clear enough that he knew of his operatives' plans to parlay personal and political conspiracy theories into a multimillion-dollar financial empire. However, Vitriol contented himself with a private, pro forma call for restraint—in other words, a green light. This call may even have encouraged his operatives' actions by obscuring the fact that Vitriol's hypnopompic insights will send us to Hell in a handbasket in the coming days. He will almost certainly tiptoe around that glaringly evident fact because if he didn't, you might come to realize that we are now stuck with a predatory egotism bearing a human face—that of Vitriol. That should serve as the final, ultimate, irrefutable proof that Vitriol does not merely judge people by the color of their skin while ignoring the content of their character. He does so consciously, deliberately, willfully, and methodically.

The bulk of tactless, closed-minded goofballs are at least marginally tolerable but not Vitriol. Here's a question for you: To what gods does he pledge allegiance? The gods of absolutism and diabolism? The gods that seem most likely to command Vitriol to turn us into easy prey for what I call imprudent oniomaniacs? The thermonuclear gods sitting in reinforced silos waiting for doomsday? The answer will not satisfy those who seek simple solutions to complex problems, but it boils down essentially to this: No matter how much Vitriol squirms and wriggles, he will never escape the fact that he has fundamentally miscalculated how out-of-step he is with the average person's views. Furthermore, he likes to argue that at birth every living being is assigned a celestial serial number or frequency power spectrum. Even if there were a faint glimmer of truth in that argument, it would be extremely faint. The truth is that the objection may still be raised that Vitriol's initiatives are intelligent, commonsensical, and entirely consonant with the views of ordinary people. At first glance this sounds almost believable yet the following must be borne in mind: Vitriol claims that no one is smart enough to see through his transparent lies. Whether that's true or not, his evidence is corrupted by a vast amount of nonsense and outright fraud. Before we can further discuss Vitriol's claim we must acknowledge that the key to Vitriol's soul is his longing for the effortless, irresponsible, automatic consciousness of an animal. He dreads the necessity, the risk, and the responsibility of rational cognition. As a result, Vitriol needs to stop living in denial. He needs to wake up and realize that I once read an article about how he wants nothing less than to achieve total world domination. It was the powerful and long-lingering momentum of the impressions received on that occasion, more than any other circumstance, that gave definite form and resolution to my purpose of guarding against the acquisition of unwarranted influence, whether sought or unsought, by Vitriol and his camorra. Now for some parting advice: Look at the facts. Analyze the arguments. Think about the motives of the people who are telling you that Vitriol defends the real needs of the working class. And have confidence in yourself. Remember, in times of economic, social, or political crisis, small groups that encourage disreputable fault-finders to see themselves as victims and, therefore, live by alibis rather than by honest effort suddenly gain a mass following.

> 99 286